Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Late-season nitrogen may improve soybean meal used in livestock feed
Lack of broadband funds from BEAD could impact  Illinois farmers
New invasive Asian copperleaf weed detected in Illinois fields
Farmers need to understand farm water usage prior to data center talks
2026 World Pork Expo just around the corner at Iowa State Fairgrounds
Ohio Wine Producers Association launches Thyme for Wine Herb Trail experience
Mounted archery takes aim at Rising Glory Farm
Significant rain, coupled with cool weather, slows Midwest fieldwork
Indiana’s net farm income projected to drop more than $1 billion this year
Started as a learning tool, Old World Garden Farms is growing
Senator Rand Paul introduces Hemp Safety Enforcement Act
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Crop insurance company answers views in a recent Pennings column
After reading the June 20 Policy Pennings article, Moral hazard may inhibit crop insurance system, (Farm World, page 4) we felt it necessary to respond because it attempts to portray all farmers as trying to game the system for financial gain.

While bad examples can be found in all industries, our experience over 10-plus years working with hundreds of crop insurance customers in no way supports the examples used in this article.
First, the system has policies, procedures, audits and penalties (i.e. federal prison) that discourages these incidents, but most importantly the vast majority of farmers have a sense of fair play and honesty. For the article to suggest otherwise is just offensive to those of us who respect and cherish the farmer clients we work with every day.

We suspect the only moral hazards here are the authors who are only interested in highlighting obscure or unfounded examples that support their political view of the crop insurance system.

Ron Hassler                   Gerald Nickel
Crop Insurance Manager   President
Midwest Ag Finance          Midwest Ag Finance
7/5/2012