Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Illinois announces loan program for grain storage, diesel tax deferral 
INFB legislative priorities include diagnostic lab, property tax and assessment reform
Simply from Scratch offers farm-to-table mobile grocery
Ag labor remains in the spotlight; ICE raids renew focus on solutions
Indiana farmers can temporarily use off-road diesel fuel to haul grain 
Canines to the rescue as spotted lanternfly battle rages on in Indiana, Ohio
Stalk rot is among issues that could clip corn yields
Trump signs executive orders that cover the U.S. beef industry
Goats and sheep clear land and add revenue stream 
AI is reshaping American food and ag, but federal policy lags behind
Indiana farmland values remain stable despite regional differences
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Crop insurance company answers views in a recent Pennings column
After reading the June 20 Policy Pennings article, Moral hazard may inhibit crop insurance system, (Farm World, page 4) we felt it necessary to respond because it attempts to portray all farmers as trying to game the system for financial gain.

While bad examples can be found in all industries, our experience over 10-plus years working with hundreds of crop insurance customers in no way supports the examples used in this article.
First, the system has policies, procedures, audits and penalties (i.e. federal prison) that discourages these incidents, but most importantly the vast majority of farmers have a sense of fair play and honesty. For the article to suggest otherwise is just offensive to those of us who respect and cherish the farmer clients we work with every day.

We suspect the only moral hazards here are the authors who are only interested in highlighting obscure or unfounded examples that support their political view of the crop insurance system.

Ron Hassler                   Gerald Nickel
Crop Insurance Manager   President
Midwest Ag Finance          Midwest Ag Finance
7/5/2012