Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Started as a learning tool, Old World Garden Farms is growing
Senator Rand Paul introduces Hemp Safety Enforcement Act
March cattle feedlot placements are the second lowest since 1996
Diverse Corn Belt Project looks at agricultural diversification
Deere settles right-to-repair lawsuit for $99 million; judge still has to approve the deal
YEDA: From a kitchen table to a national movement
Insurer: Illinois farm collision claims reached 180 last year
Indiana to invest $1 billion to add jobs in ag, life sciences
Illinois farmer turned flood prone fields to his advantage with rice
1,702 students participate in Wilmington College judging contest
Despite heavy rain and snow in April drought conditions expanding
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Great Lakes restoration funding asked for by an Ohio Congressman



By KEVIN WALKER
Michigan Correspondent

WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Rep. David Joyce (R-Ohio) has reintroduced legislation that would provide funding to renew the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI).
H.R. 223, the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Act of 2015, would authorize $300 million each year from 2016-20 to carry out various initiatives to improve the quality of Great Lakes waters. This is the successor bill to H.R. 5764, the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Act of 2014, which passed the U.S. House on Dec. 9 by a voice vote, but then died in the Senate.
“This is a huge victory for the Great Lakes,” Joyce said Dec. 9. “The Great Lakes continue to be a treasure of the world, and there’s going to come a time when water is the new oil, so we have to make investments to secure this important resource.
“GLRI is the most significant restoration effort to date for the Great Lakes and it is crucial that it be authorized into law, so that these programs can continue. The passing of this legislation sends a clear message that the Great Lakes are worth protecting.
“This program allowed us to finish the cleanup of Ashtabula Harbor and remove decades of toxic sludge. Clearly these programs are working, and this success story in Ashtabula demonstrates why we must ensure that the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative receives the funding it needs,” he said.
According to Joyce, GLRI funds played a crucial role in the cleanup of 630,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment that contained 25,000 pounds of hazardous compounds from the Ashtabula River. Because of those efforts, water quality improved and the river channel was deepened, making the river once again suitable for maritime commerce, fishing and recreational boating.
Last September the Ashtabula was taken off the EPA’s list of Areas of Concern. GLRI money has helped delist five such areas in recent years. In the 25 years leading up to GLRI, Joyce said, only one such area had been cleaned up and taken off the list.
GLRI money has also been used to double the acreage enrolled in agricultural conservation programs in watersheds where phosphorus runoff contributes to harmful algal blooms in western Lake Erie, Saginaw Bay and Green Bay. GLRI funds have been used to finance more than 2,000 projects.
President Barack Obama started the GLRI, which is similar to a program started by former President George W. Bush.
The program has been operating without standalone legislation for the past five years, said Matt Doss, policy director at the Great Lakes Commission. Although it can continue without standalone legislation, a bill such as Joyce’s would confer more legitimacy on the program, he said.
“You’re on a firmer foundation when you have explicit statutory authority for a program like this,” he said. “This is especially true when there’s a change in administrations.
“GLRI is highly important. It’s one of the most important things we’ve done for the Great Lakes in a generation. A lot of focus has been on reducing algal blooms that are caused by runoff from farms. There’s been quite a bit of resources being put into that.”
Although Joyce’s 2014 bill easily passed the House last year, there is no schedule yet for possible action on H.R. 223. The bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment on Jan. 9.
1/29/2015