Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Painted Mail Pouch barns going, going, but not gone
Pork exports are up 14%; beef exports are down
Miami County family receives Hoosier Homestead Awards 
OBC culinary studio to enhance impact of beef marketing efforts
Baltimore bridge collapse will have some impact on ag industry
Michigan, Ohio latest states to find HPAI in dairy herds
The USDA’s Farmers.gov local dashboard available nationwide
Urban Acres helpng Peoria residents grow food locally
Illinois dairy farmers were digging into soil health week

Farmers expected to plant less corn, more soybeans, in 2024
Deere 4440 cab tractor racked up $18,000 at farm retirement auction
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Maybe movies are best warning to 'Jurassic Ranch'
If you thought living next to Ted Turner’s buffalo was bad, just wait until you hear this. According to a report on CNN and a story written in Newser by Arden Dier, scientists are trying to revive what was once the largest land mammal in Europe for more than 250,000 years. It’s called an Auroch.
 
There’s only one problem: It was last seen grazing in a Polish forest in 1627.
 
Supposedly, the reason the mad scientists want to bring back the extinct Auroch is because many areas in Europe are becoming barren, probably because they kicked the cattle and sheep off.
 
The Aurochs are being called “super cows,” but by looking at cave paintings of them, I must say they’d never win Denver and I doubt the American Angus Assoc. is shaking in their shorts, fearing the competition. For the foreseeable future the initials AAA will still stand for the Angus Assoc. and the Auto Club, not the American Auroch Assoc.
 
The animals the scientists want to recreate are nearly as big as elephants, but without all the trunks and other baggage. It looks to me like the Aurochs would be long on hamburger, seven bone roasts and brisket and extremely light in the filet mignon department.
 
The scientists admit the Aurochs had tiny rumps and udders and were “not very productive in meat or milk.” So why revive them? Because they can. Scientists are like kids with a new toy and, darn it, they’re going to play with it. These scientists are called “gene editors” and they’re much like regular editors, only without all the grammar stuff they’re so uptight about.
 
The gene editors say that an animal is never really extinct (tell that to the dodo bird). They should also tell it to the bureaucrats who are trying to save hairynose  wombats, Mexican walking fish, bird-eating spiders and leaping lesbian lizards. (Really).
 
As I understand it, as long as the “ancient DNA” that once made up the Auroch is still present in a living population, scientists can now go back, capture those genes and put back together the animal that once was. Theoretically, they could go back and recreate your rich great-grandfather, although I don’t know why, considering he may want your ranch back.
 
Auroch genes have been found in breeds of cattle including Dexters, Kerrys, Welsh Blacks and White Parks – which sound more like thuggish Irish street gangs than cattle.
 
Another reason the scientists want to bring back the Aurochs is fertility. Not the Auroch’s fertility, mind you – someone’s wife’s, mistress’ or girlfriend’s! You see, hundreds of thousands years ago brave men would try to kill an Auroch and cut off the patch of hair on its forehead, then they’d make a belt out of it and give it to their significant other in order to make her more fertile. This makes little sense to me. On the one hand it will make her more fertile, but it will also keep her pants up.
 
Alas, the effort to bring back the Aurochs suffered a setback in 2015 when a British Auroch farmer had to kill several of his animals before they killed him. It seems these 3,000-pound beasts don’t like humans and are “impossible” to domesticate. The Romans used to entertain themselves by putting them in big arenas with several Roman cowboys to see who came out alive. Researchers have found evidence of violent Auroch fights in Polish forests from 400 years ago. We’re not talking here about some minor domestic dispute.
 
The only advantage I can see to running Aurochs versus cattle is that Aurochs were able to fight off marauding packs of wolves – which, if the feds don’t slow down, will become much more important. The disadvantages to running Aurochs would be you’ll need a D9 to pull an Auroch calf and you’ll also need tougher dogs, bigger squeeze chutes, more muscular wives, stronger rope and more reliable ropers. When you catch the horns of an Auroch and dally up, you’re going to want to be sure your partner is going to scoop up the heels or you’re going to need to be on one very fast horse when the elephant-sized Auroch runs up the rope back at you.
 
If the gene editors insist on bringing back the Aurochs, they need to be rebuilding Secretariat at the same time.
 
The views and opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of Farm World. Readers may log on to www.LeePittsbooks.com to order any of Lee Pitts’ books. Those with questions or comments for Lee may write
to him in care of this publication.
4/13/2017