Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Diverse Corn Belt Project looks at agricultural diversification
Deere settles right-to-repair lawsuit for $99 million; judge still has to approve the deal
YEDA: From a kitchen table to a national movement
Insurer: Illinois farm collision claims reached 180 last year
Indiana to invest $1 billion to add jobs in ag, life sciences
Illinois farmer turned flood prone fields to his advantage with rice
1,702 students participate in Wilmington College judging contest
Despite heavy rain and snow in April drought conditions expanding
Indiana company uses AI to supply farmers with their own corn genetics
Crash Course Village, Montgomery County FB offer ag rescue training
Panel examines effects of Iran war at the farm gate
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Ohio bill would permit small livestock
By DOUG GRAVES
Ohio Correspondent
 
COLUMBUS, Ohio — Goats, chickens and rabbits – for Ohioans, these animals and many, many more could be coming to a backyard nearby.
 
On tap is a new state bill aimed to sidestep local zoning regulations and allow homeowners to have some small barnyard animals on property not originally intended for agriculture.
 
The formal measure is called House Bill 175 and is being sponsored by State Rep. Tom Brinkman Jr. (R-Mt. Lookout) and backed by 20 cosponsors. It’s commonly being called the “barnyard bill.” While it leaves the door open to what barn animals can be raised, it specifically rejects roosters and small livestock that create a nuisance.
 
Brinkman’s bill prescribes a limit of how many small livestock can be kept in a residential backyard based on overall acreage and the type of animal. The bill would allow homeowners to have one goat for every 0.3 acre of land, one chicken or fowl for every 0.05 acre and a rabbit or other small animal for every 0.5 acre. It would also require sanitary living conditions.
 
H.B. 175 is intended to ease the tension already brewing in many Ohio municipalities. In Montgomery and Greene counties the debate of whether to permit barnyard animals in residential areas is ongoing. Phil Parker, a Beavercreek resident (just east of Dayton), said he grew up on a farm raising chickens, hogs and cattle in a rural community.
 
“Beavercreek has changed a lot and I don’t think your average citizen, your average household, wants to deal with chickens,” he said.
 
On the other hand, Jim and Pam Reisen said chickens are “pets with benefits” of eggs, and they should be allowed in the city. “It shouldn’t be any different if you have a chicken or a dog,” Jim Reisen said. “I could have a 150-pound dog in my backyard but that’s okay, but a 5- or 6-pound chicken is objectionable. It doesn’t make sense.”
 
At this time there is a city charter that bans chickens in Huber Heights, located just north of Dayton. The charter also indicates that roosters, which are notoriously noisy, aren’t included as small livestock. The city of Dayton itself is now taking a survey of citizens, asking whether such small farm animals should be permitted within city limits. 
4/26/2017