Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Insurer: Illinois farm collision claims reached 180 last year
Indiana to invest $1 billion to add jobs in ag, life sciences
Illinois farmer turned flood prone fields to his advantage with rice
1,702 students participate in Wilmington College judging contest
Despite heavy rain and snow in April drought conditions expanding
Indiana company uses AI to supply farmers with their own corn genetics
Crash Course Village, Montgomery County FB offer ag rescue training
Panel examines effects of Iran war at the farm gate
Area students represent FFA at National Ag Day in Washington
Garver Farm Market wins zoning appeal to keep ag designation
House Ag’s Brown calls on Trump to intercede to assist farmers
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
5,000-hog CAFO approved in near north-central Iowa town
By DOUG SCHMITZ
Iowa Correspondent
 
CORWITH, Iowa — The Hancock County Board of Supervisors in north-central Iowa have approved the construction of a 5,000-head hog confinement, about four miles east of Corwith.
 
In a May 15 public hearing, the board approved matrix scoring for two new 2,500-head deep pit swine finisher confinement buildings in the facility. “It had more points than what the matrix required,” board member Florence Greiman told Farm World. According to the Mason City Globe-Gazette, the county’s zoning administrator, Andy Buffington, evaluated the proposal based on the state’s master matrix – the required framework for scoring such applications.

“The matrix scores applications based on separation distances from residences, churches, businesses and water sources,” the article explained. “The type of manure and how it is stored and disposed also are among the factors considered.”

Located in Section 26 of Boone Township, the hog confinement will be built by Grey Owl Farms VI, LLC. On April 3, a public hearing was also held on the permit application for Peacock Farms VI, LLC, for three deep pit swine finisher confinement buildings for a new 7,490-head swine confinement facility in Section 6 of Britt Township.

No public hearing, however, has yet been scheduled to discuss the proposal of this facility, Greiman said. So far there have been no protests of either facility Greiman’s husband, Cory, noted. “We have approved a few buildings this year and last year and have not had anyone from the public complain,” he said. “No one, except the producers, have attended our hearings. We have not encountered any resistance or complaints from activists.” 
6/8/2017