Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Mounted archery takes aim at Rising Glory Farm
Significant rain, coupled with cool weather, slows Midwest fieldwork
Indiana’s net farm income projected to drop more than $1 billion this year
Started as a learning tool, Old World Garden Farms is growing
Senator Rand Paul introduces Hemp Safety Enforcement Act
March cattle feedlot placements are the second lowest since 1996
Diverse Corn Belt Project looks at agricultural diversification
Deere settles right-to-repair lawsuit for $99 million; judge still has to approve the deal
YEDA: From a kitchen table to a national movement
Insurer: Illinois farm collision claims reached 180 last year
Indiana to invest $1 billion to add jobs in ag, life sciences
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Ohio livestock coalition rallying behind Issue 2

By CELESTE BAUMGARTNER
Ohio Correspondent

LEBANON, Ohio — Campaign buttons, yard signs, bumper stickers, posters – they were all free for the taking at the Ohioans for Livestock Care/Yes for Issue 2 rally held in Warren County.

This was the second-to-last in a series of rallies held throughout the state to gain support for State Issue 2, a proposal on the Nov. 3 state ballot to create the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board.
“We’ve got out supporters here, we’re going to mobilize them,” said Steve Caminati, campaign manager for Ohioans for Livestock Care.

“We have been preaching to the choir; it is time for them to sing to the congregation. We’re encouraging these people to talk to friends, families, go to the suburbs, go to the urban areas and get the word out.”

The grassroots effort in a campaign can never be underestimated, Caminati said.

The rallies have reached close to 1,000 people.

State Rep. Tim Derickson (R- District 53) told the group about the discussions that took place before the legislature passed a joint resolution authorizing a statewide ballot measure creating the state care standards board.

The idea was initiated by the Ohio Farm Bureau and all of the major commodity groups.

Prior to discussion all of the legislators in the House and the Senate met with these groups to understand the issue, Derickson said.

“That is why there was such overwhelming support in both the House and Senate,” he said. “It was nice to see both Republicans and Democrats feeling strongly that this board was important to both parties. It wasn’t a partisan issue at all.”
The legislators understood if they did not address the state constitution to create this board, the state’s largest industry could be hurt drastically, he said.

“We need to protect this industry, and that is not a Republican or Democratic thing,” said Derickson, who was a dairy farmer.
“It is, save an industry or not. For those of us who have been involved in agriculture in one way or another, it was the most encouraging debate that we have had in this General Assembly.”
Doug Dyer, another speaker who addressed the group, is president of the Brown County Farm Bureau and a vocational-ag instructor for 36 years.

“Who would’ve ever thought farmers would have to defend what they do?” he said. “We produce abundantly and without that abundance, people would be hungry.”

Issue 2 is not a family-farm versus big-farm issue, Dyer said. It is an animal care issue designed to prevent out-of-state people and politically active groups from coming into Ohio and making certain aspects of agricultural production managements illegal.
“The long and short of it is, like it or not, if you argue against the big farms you’re arguing for a scarcer, more expensive food supply,” he said.

Dyer encouraged the group to say something about Issue 2 every time they have the chance: Have your facts ready and be congenial, he said.

Finally, Ohio Farm Bureau Organiza-tional Director Christy Montoya encouraged attendees to take buttons, bumper stickers, posters and go to football games or wherever and “talk ‘til you’re blue in the face.”

10/21/2009