Search Site   
Current News Stories
Family farm turns from tradional to producing smiles from visitors
Indiana proclaims Antique Tractor Preservation Day on July 31
Kentucky high school seniors attend Institute for Future Agricultural Leaders
Michigan farmer, author inspires ag-literate kids
Farm injury prevention and treatment topic of web series
Experts offer tips on how to resolve issue of mucky, aging farm ponds
Indiana farmer dies after becoming overcome by smoke in grain bin
Ladage gains writing insight from tractors, people, small towns
Trump extends waiver for foreign ships to transport goods to US
Tennessee communities offered financial assistance to expand tree canopies
The export of Mexican avocados to the US stopped
   
News Articles
Search News  
   
Federal judge halts loan forgiveness program for farmers of color
 
MILWAUKEE (AP) — A federal judge has halted a loan forgiveness program for farmers of color in response to a lawsuit alleging the program discriminates against white farmers.
U.S. District Judge William Griesbach in Milwaukee issued a temporary restraining order suspending the program for socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.
The program pays up to 120 percent of direct or guaranteed farm loan balances for Black, American Indian, Hispanic, Asian American or Pacific Islander farmers. President Joe Biden’s administration created the loan forgiveness program as part of its COVID-19 pandemic relief plan.
Emily Newton, the lead attorney representing the U.S. Department of Agriculture in the lawsuit, didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment on the restraining order.
Minority farmers have maintained for decades that they have been unfairly denied farm loans and other government assistance. Federal agriculture officials in 1999 and 2010 settled lawsuits from Black farmers accusing the agency of discriminating against them.
Conservative law firm Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed suit in April arguing white farmers aren’t eligible, amounting to a violation of their constitutional rights. The firm sued on behalf of 12 farmers from Wisconsin, Minnesota, South Dakota, Missouri, Iowa, Arkansas, Oregon and Kentucky.
6/14/2021