Search Site   
Current News Stories
Illinois announces loan program for grain storage, diesel tax deferral 
INFB legislative priorities include diagnostic lab, property tax and assessment reform
Indiana Pork, HATCH partner to celebrate National Pork Month
Simply from Scratch offers farm-to-table mobile grocery
Iowan Courtney Knupp bringing new energy to USB leadership
FFA member studies mental health impact after Hurricane Helene
Paul Wallem pens book to help first-generation farmers
Some farmers raise concerns over China’s remaining 10 percent tariff
‘It’s a heritage thing’: Ohioans keep hand corn husking tradition alive
Farm fun at the Fort Dodge Museum and Frontier Village
Diesel tax cut will offer little relief, farmers and truckers say
   
News Articles
Search News  
   
Federal judge halts loan forgiveness program for farmers of color
 
MILWAUKEE (AP) — A federal judge has halted a loan forgiveness program for farmers of color in response to a lawsuit alleging the program discriminates against white farmers.
U.S. District Judge William Griesbach in Milwaukee issued a temporary restraining order suspending the program for socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.
The program pays up to 120 percent of direct or guaranteed farm loan balances for Black, American Indian, Hispanic, Asian American or Pacific Islander farmers. President Joe Biden’s administration created the loan forgiveness program as part of its COVID-19 pandemic relief plan.
Emily Newton, the lead attorney representing the U.S. Department of Agriculture in the lawsuit, didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment on the restraining order.
Minority farmers have maintained for decades that they have been unfairly denied farm loans and other government assistance. Federal agriculture officials in 1999 and 2010 settled lawsuits from Black farmers accusing the agency of discriminating against them.
Conservative law firm Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed suit in April arguing white farmers aren’t eligible, amounting to a violation of their constitutional rights. The firm sued on behalf of 12 farmers from Wisconsin, Minnesota, South Dakota, Missouri, Iowa, Arkansas, Oregon and Kentucky.
6/14/2021