Search Site   
Current News Stories
Producers get closer look at broomcorn for organic transition
Indiana Beef Cattle Association to host 2026 Field Day at Purdue Beef Unit
Wool Lab hopes to make production more efficient in Montana
Vollmer ag equipment collection yielded a rich harvest
ISA hosts delegation of soybean buyers from China
Passing the torch: Young folk lured to antique machinery
Several rounds of storms cause flooding, wind damage
Illinois FFA member one of 4 American Star Farmer finalists
Hybrid pioneer Gene Funk Jr. honored with plaque
Collegiate Farm Bureau  chapter is launched at Findlay College
National Route US 66 Museum, the Farm Machinery Museum and more!
   
News Articles
Search News  
   
New York City’s foie gras ban challenged
 
NEW YORK (AP) – New York City’s planned ban on the sale of foie gras is being challenged in court by two upstate farms that claim it would leave them financially devastated.
The two major foie gras producers, Hudson Valley Foie Gras and La Belle Farm, said the law enacting the ban set to go into effect Nov. 25 should be declared “invalid and void” in a lawsuit filed recently in state court in Manhattan.
Proponents say the production of foie gras – the fattened liver of a duck or goose – is cruel to the animals because it involves force feeding.
While the ban has been cheered by animal welfare advocates, the farms said the loss of the vital city market would jeopardize their operations. La Belle anticipates having to let go most of its 100 employees and may be forced out of business. Hudson Valley would have to terminate dozens of employees, according to the complaint.
The farms argue the city law should be invalidated in part because it imposes a ban on the sale of products that can be produced and sold in compliance with state and federal law. The lawsuit also argues that the city exceeded its authority by “attempting to eliminate” farming operations about 80 miles away.
“The city’s attempt to legislate a farming practice occurring outside its borders is unprecedented and alarming,” according to the complaint.
A spokesperson for the city corporation counsel said the lawsuit is under review.

6/7/2022