Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Mounted archery takes aim at Rising Glory Farm
Significant rain, coupled with cool weather, slows Midwest fieldwork
Indiana’s net farm income projected to drop more than $1 billion this year
Started as a learning tool, Old World Garden Farms is growing
Senator Rand Paul introduces Hemp Safety Enforcement Act
March cattle feedlot placements are the second lowest since 1996
Diverse Corn Belt Project looks at agricultural diversification
Deere settles right-to-repair lawsuit for $99 million; judge still has to approve the deal
YEDA: From a kitchen table to a national movement
Insurer: Illinois farm collision claims reached 180 last year
Indiana to invest $1 billion to add jobs in ag, life sciences
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
OSU economist: Corn prices likely to fall, not rise, in ’12
By VICKI JOHNSON
Ohio Correspondent

BELLEVUE, Ohio — It’s twice as likely corn prices will decrease than increase in the coming year, according to Ohio State University agricultural economist Matt Roberts. And he wouldn’t be surprised to see it sell for $4-$4.50 per bushel by harvest time.

“There’s a one-in-three chance of corn prices going up during the coming year and a two-in-three chance they will go down,” Roberts said last week during an Agricultural Policy and Outlook meeting. About 75 people attended the meeting in Bellevue, hosted by First National Bank.

Roberts said the factors that created growth and high prices during the past five years have changed. “We’re not in that this year,” he said. “What we are in is a short-crop market. In the last five years, we’ve seen higher prices because of the demand-driven market. Where we’re going is not where we’ve been.”

Although global demand in general was increasing, he said the main two drivers of high corn prices have been Chinese imports and ethanol production. While the federal government’s renewable fuels mandate will keep ethanol in production, Roberts said the federal subsidy expired Dec. 31, 2011, and he doesn’t foresee it being renewed. The result is a glut of ethanol that is not profitable to produce.

“Demand’s very weak right now,” he said. “I don’t think the industry disappears, but I look for some bankruptcies to restructure debt. From a marketing perspective I’d keep that in the back of my head.”

Roberts said he see less of a price decrease in soybeans. “And I have no idea what’s going on in soft red winter wheat,” he said. “There’s no good story for why we have the flat prices we do.”
Overshadowing everything is the European economy, he said. “The reality is, everything goes sideways if the European debt crisis worsens,” he said. “None of this really matters.”

Carl Zulauf, another ag economist in OSU’s Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics, reviewed farm programs and the new farm bill. He recommended farmers consider the Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) program this year instead of staying with the traditional target price system.
“It’s really not good management if you haven’t thought about going into the ACRE program,” he said. “I would encourage you do that and consider the price differentials. My advice to you is to think about this.”

Although most aspects of the 2012 farm bill still are undergoing debate that likely will continue for much of the year, Zulauf said federal debt and other concerns probably will create some changes.
“’Major’ might be too strong a word, but this is not an insignificant change in the safety net,” he said. He said it’s likely the direct payment system of price supports will be eliminated, saving $5 billion.

“One of the hardest things to defend right now is why farmers are getting payments when crop prices are high,” he said. “What (the lack of) direct payments will impact for farmers is cash flow. You will have to borrow more money, and that ‘s the real impact.”
Other farm bill topics under scrutiny are levels of conservation spending, farm insurance subsidies and changes to other revenue programs.

“One of the themes that will come out of this farm bill is an attempt to lower prices, and that might not be a bad thing,” Zulauf said. “At these (current) prices you are encouraging other people to produce and you are discouraging the building of demand. Seven-dollar corn is not good for anyone, including corn producers.”

Zulauf doesn’t see a renewal of the biofuel subsidy that expired Dec. 31 because of the diverse group of people who oppose it. “It isn’t clear you need the subsidy when you have a mandate to begin with,” he said.

“One of the things that bears watching in the next 12 months or so is do we see a slowdown in ethanol production because of the loss of the subsidy.”

Zulauf doesn’t expect the price of oil imports to decrease. “You better get ready for $4 gasoline this spring, and there are people talking about $5 gasoline,” he said.

Barry Ward, leader in production business management at OSU, recommended farmers look at on-farm fertilizer storage as an alternative to buying crop inputs as they are needed.
“We can track those fertilizer prices and look for buying opportunities,” he said. “And it can spread out fertilizer purchases.”
He also said tenants should discuss flexible cash leases with landowners to help spread the wealth and the risk associated with high cash rents. For examples and information on flexible cash rent leases, he suggested the websites www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/wholefarm/html/c2-22.html and http://aglease101.org
3/1/2012