Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
Mounted archery takes aim at Rising Glory Farm
Significant rain, coupled with cool weather, slows Midwest fieldwork
Indiana’s net farm income projected to drop more than $1 billion this year
Started as a learning tool, Old World Garden Farms is growing
Senator Rand Paul introduces Hemp Safety Enforcement Act
March cattle feedlot placements are the second lowest since 1996
Diverse Corn Belt Project looks at agricultural diversification
Deere settles right-to-repair lawsuit for $99 million; judge still has to approve the deal
YEDA: From a kitchen table to a national movement
Insurer: Illinois farm collision claims reached 180 last year
Indiana to invest $1 billion to add jobs in ag, life sciences
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
Look for the extension of a sign, not the sign itself
March 18, 2012
Background Scripture: John 2:1-12
Devotional Reading: John 17:1-50
Last week we saw the first chapter of the Gospel according to John set forth some of the main themes of the Fourth Gospel: the Word, grace, truth, darkness, light, acceptance, rejection and the Lamb of God.

John 2 is an introduction into the ways in which those themes will be presented throughout John’s gospel. The wedding at Can, recounted in John 2:1-12, is meant to help us with interpreting the rest of the gospel.

John demonstrates here that, in considering his narratives about Jesus, there are always several layers of meaning: the obvious event in itself and the different levels of meaning to which the event points. At the conclusion of the story of the wedding at Cana, John writes, “This the first of his signs, Jesus did at Cana in Galilee, and manifested his glory …” (2:11).

Note that although John tells us that the water was turned to wine, he does not use the word “miracle.” In fact, in most translations of the Bible, the word “miracle” appears only a few times, and it is generally agreed the term is a mistranslation of the original Hebrew or Greek.

“Signs,” “wonders” and “marvels” are much closer to what the writer is saying to us. John stretches our understanding of these events by calling them signs. (“Sign” and “signs” appear 17 times in John’s gospel.)

Why is “miracles” an inadequate translation? Because it is a fairly modern concept and generally signifies that an event is a miracle – meaning it defies or breaks the laws of nature. But even the term “miracle” is today archaic, because the present and emerging theories of physics provide possible room for events that violate not nature itself, but the ways in which we normally experience nature.
The signs and wonders of Jesus are better thought of as paranormal – something beyond our normal experience – rather than supernatural, or contrary to nature itself.

Pointing beyond

Unfortunately, some people never get beyond Jesus’ turning of the water to wine. That act by Jesus is a sign in that it points not to itself, but to something beyond the obvious. When you come to a STOP sign while driving, you need to concentrate not on the sign itself, but what it’s pointing to; focusing on the sign alone can be dangerous.

So the sign in John 2 is turning the water to wine, but it points to something far more important. Look at the sign for a moment.
It begins with Mary, Jesus’ mother, coming to him with a pedestrian problem: In the middle of the great wedding feast, the demand for wine is greater than the supply. Knowing her son has strange powers, she says to him, “They have no wine!” (2:3).

In Jesus’ day, and probably in our time, running out of wine at the wedding celebration was a social faux pas. A wedding was one of the top social events of any village, often lasting a whole week. No couple wanted to start their life together getting the wedding feast “wrong.”

So, in John 2 we see the obvious level: Jesus’ mother  attending a marriage feast in Cana, a town near Nazareth and the home of the recently-called disciple, Nathaniel; Mary turning to Jesus when the marital family is about to be embarrassed because there is not enough wine; and Jesus responding to his mother, turning the water to wine.

A tall order

Some people think Jesus spoke harshly to his mother’s request: “O woman, what have you to do with me? My hour has not yet come” (2:9), but Bible scholars tell us this is a translation problem, for “Woman” was an address of respect, not disdain.

That Jesus responded to her request to “do something” indicates although he was reluctant to intervene, out of respect for his mother and the marital family he succeeded to the need. John assures us the compassion of Jesus is extended to each of us in even the everyday activities of life.

All of us need to heed Mary’s advice to the servants: “Do whatever he tells you” (2:5). Sometimes that can be a tall order!
So what does this passage mean beyond the events described in John 2:1-11? If turning the water to wine is a “sign,” to what is this sign pointing at a deeper level? The answer lies in the water jars. They contain water used for the Jewish rite of purification; the ritual washing of hands at meals.

Note that there were six stone jars, not seven. The Jews regarded seven as the complete and perfect number, so six jars suggests the supply of water for purification is imperfect and unfinished, suggesting the Jewish laws are imperfect and incomplete. But the water transformed into wine represents the superiority of the gospel to the law.

As the six pots totaled approximately 180 gallons, they would be more than enough for the wedding feast. So the sign indicates that the superior revelation of the presence and power of God is in the gospel of Jesus Christ. And as William Barclay puts it, John “wants us to see that whenever Jesus comes into a person’s life, there comes a new quality which is like turning water to wine.”

John calls us to look beyond the sign to understand that the power of Jesus Christ comes to us in abundance.

The views and opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of Farm World. Readers with questions or comments for Rev. Althouse may write to him in care of this publication.
3/15/2012