Search Site   
News Stories at a Glance
ICGA Farm Economy Temperature Survey shows farmers concerned
Ohio drought conditions putting farmers in a bind
IPPA rolls out apprentice program on some junior college campuses
Dairy heifer replacements at 20-year low; could fall further
Safety expert: Rollovers are just ‘tip of the iceberg’ of farm deaths
Final MAHA draft walks back earlier pesticide suggestions
ALHT, avian influenza called high priority threats to Indiana farms
Kentucky gourd farm is the destination for artists and crafters
A year later, Kentucky Farmland Transition Initiative making strides
Unseasonably cool temperatures, dry soil linger ahead of harvest
Firefighting foam made of soybeans is gaining ground
   
Archive
Search Archive  
   
News from Around the Farm World
USDA gives disaster status to 26 Indiana counties

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. — USDA granted Gov. Mitch Daniels’ request for disaster designation for 26 Indiana counties due to frost and snow that occurred from April 4-10. This makes farmers eligible for low-interest emergency loans from Farm Service Agency (FSA).

“This spring’s unusually cold weather came at a bad time for Indiana’s peach and apple crops, in addition to other fruit crops,” said Indiana Agriculture Director Andy Miller. “These disaster designations will allow assistance for our state’s farmers who need it.”

USDA determined the following 26 counties received sufficient production losses to warrant primary disaster designation: Brown, Jasper, Morgan, Rush, Clark, Jefferson, Newton, Scott, Dearborn, Johnson, Ohio, Shelby, Hancock, Knox, Orange, Starke, Henry, Lake, Owen, Washington, Howard, Lawrence, Posey, Wayne, Jackson and Monroe.

The following 41 are named as contiguous disaster counties: Bartholomew, Fayette, Jennings, Putnam, Benton, Floyd, La Porte, Randolph, Carroll, Franklin, Madison, Ripley, Cass, Fulton, Marion, St. Joseph, Clay, Gibson, Marshall, Sullivan, Clinton, Grant, Martin, Switzerland, Crawford, Greene, Miami, Tipton, Daviess, Hamilton, Pike, Union, Decatur, Harrison, Porter, Vanderburgh, Delaware, Hendricks, Pulaski, White and Dubois.

Farmers in primary and contiguous disaster areas may contact their FSA office for further information on emergency loan programs. FSA will consider each application on its own merit by taking into account the extent of losses, security available and repayment ability.

Environmental groups claim Iowa DNR violates federal rules

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Environmental groups on Thursday asked the federal government to revoke Iowa’s oversight of factory farms, arguing that the nation’s largest hog producing state hasn’t enforced rules limiting release of pollution into waterways.

Iowa produces about 25 million hogs a year, according to the Iowa Pork Producers Assoc. The groups filed a petition to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) accusing the state of allowing the industry to illegally discharge millions of gallons of manure into rivers and streams, killing fish and hurting water quality.

“If the state will not properly enforce and implement the Clean Water Act in Iowa, then the state should no longer be allowed to administer the program. That is why we want the EPA to take over the administration of the program in Iowa,” Pam Mackey-Taylor, chairwoman of the Sierra Club’s Iowa Chapter, said at a news conference held outside offices of the state Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

The main claim of the environmental groups — the Sierra Club, Environmental Integrity Project and Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement — is that DNR fails to issue operating permits required by federal law to concentrated animal feeding operations that discharge waste. This affects primarily hog producers, but also Iowa cattle and egg producers. The petition also argues that Iowa laws don’t meet minimum standards in the Clean Water Act.

“This is not just about IDNR, this is about the fact that the legislature has hamstrung the entire state by passing regulations that are clearly contrary to the Clean Water Act,” said Karla Raettig, who helped draft the petition as counsel at the Washington, D.C.-based Environmental Integrity Project.

DNR responded the state requires open feed lots with more than 1,000 animals to have a permit if they discharge waste when there is 5.5 inches of rain in a 24-hour period. Smaller lots may voluntarily apply for a permit. Of the 1,800 registered feed lots in Iowa, 124 have state discharge permits. Six are pending.

In addition, the agency has a zero-discharge policy for confinement operations. It’s only if a confinement violates the rule, that it may be required by DNR to apply for a discharge permit.

“We recognize that these groups have a strong interest in the environment and water quality in Iowa, and we applaud that ... it will be up to the EPA now whether what they’re proposing has merits and should advance,” agency spokesman Kevin Baskins said. “But in the meantime, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources has been particularly diligent to try to cope with an industry that has grown by leaps and bounds.”

Hog industry officials said farmers follow regulations and that further restrictions are unnecessary.

“It frustrates them. They stop farming because they don’t want to deal with the harassment,” said Michael Formica, environmental policy counsel at the National Pork Producers Council. “That’s one less person producing food and that means prices of food goes up, and ultimately the consumer bears the brunt of all of this.”

Eldon McAfee, an attorney with Iowa Cattlemen’s Assoc., said the petition’s claims are exaggerated. “I think the cattle producers are working very hard to comply with regulations,” he said.

Raettig, counsel for the Environmental Integrity Project, said EPA is required to respond to the petition in writing, but there is no deadline to file the response. This is the second time a group has filed such a petition relating to oversight of factory farms. A Michigan chapter of the Sierra Club was the first to do so, and although EPA denied its requests, she said the agency began informal negotiations with the state to improve practices.

“I don’t know ultimately whether they will withdraw the (permit) program, but I’m sure they will take it very seriously and negotiate with DNR and with us,” she said. “We’re doing a favor here today, we are helping the state agency stand up to the industry, who has really not allowed the state to effectively regulate factory farms which are polluting your water, and this is going to be a long battle, but this is just the start.”

Soybean rust found in Kansas

MANHATTAN, Kan. (AP) — Asian soybean rust, a fungus that can wipe out a field of soybeans if uncontrolled, has been found in a field in Kansas for the first time, the Kansas Department of Agriculture announced Friday.

Researchers from the state and Kansas State University have confirmed that a leaf sample from a soybean plant found at a sentinel plot in Montgomery County has the disease. The fungus could cause problems with late-planted soybeans, leaving 300,000 acres to 400,000 acres potentially in danger, or about 10-15 percent of the state’s crop, said KSU plant pathologist Doug Jardine.

The site where the sample was found is one of 20 Kansas locations where USDA planted to monitor for the disease.

“Asian soybean rust’s arrival in Kansas was expected,” Kansas Secretary of Agriculture Adrian Polansky said in a written statement. “And we must continue to be vigilant scouting for this disease in the coming years to ensure we detect it early enough for growers to take action to protect their crops.”

9/26/2007