Search Site   
Current News Stories
Lots to see and learn at the FSR’s Gwynne Conservation Area
Ask the Experts is a great way to gain knowledge at farm show
Farm Science Review is chock full of history going back centuries
Cox Farm in southwestern Ohio has seen changes over the years
Economist: EPA 45Z guidance could trigger ‘explosive’ ethanol price action in 2026
‘Transforming Tradition’ theme at this year’s Farm Science Review
Top conservation families to be honored at Farm Science Review
Three ag leaders named to 2025 Farm Science Review Hall of Fame
Illinois House ag committee member urges bipartisan farm bill talks
A year later, Kentucky Farmland Transition Initiative making strides
Unseasonably cool temperatures, dry soil linger ahead of harvest
   
News Articles
Search News  
   
Bridge ownership disputed in Alaska
 
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) – The ownership of a bridge leading to a planned new agricultural district west of Nenana is under dispute, with an Alaska Native tribe blocking the bridge to keep out construction crews.
The Nenana Native Association, which has ended the blockade, asserted it owns the sparsely used bridge over the Nenana River, and can limit access to the area, the Anchorage Daily News reported. The mayor of Nenana, Joshua Verhagen, said the city owns the bridge and public right-of-way.
State officials said they’re looking into the ownership question.
The bridge provides a gateway to an area where Alaska Natives say they have long hunted, fished and trapped. It also provides access to the agriculture district. Construction crews this week were expected to begin working on improvements to an existing road.
The tribe has lodged concerns with efforts to open land to farming under the so-called Nenana-Totchaket Agricultural Project that the state and community of Nenana have pursued for years.
The bridge was completed in 2020 with $9 million in federal funding secured by the tribe, after Nenana launched construction with $6 million in state support.
Caroline Ketzler, first chief of the Nenana Native Association, said the state had not communicated properly with the tribe about the project.
“It deals directly with our food security as a village, that’s where we do a lot of hunting and gathering and we always have,” Ketzler said. “We want to do as much as possible to keep that land and that fragile ecosystem still functioning.”
Verhagen said the city supports the agricultural project because it could lead to more food security as farmers raise crops and livestock.
Ketzler acknowledged the tribe’s views over time have changed about that project and that it has grown opposed to further development in the area. She said the tribe is not pulling its opposition to the road extension at this time.
The blockade began Oct. 31 and ended late the next day after state transportation department officials met with the tribe. Ketzler described the meeting as productive. Organizers said the plan was to block only road crews and that none tried to travel through.
Danielle Tessen, a department spokesperson, said there was discussion about forming a team of officials from the state, road contractor and the tribe to improve communication, with other interested parties welcome to join. She said the large project requires extra communication.

11/16/2022